Cleaning protocols
Define which spaces and cleaning tasks are approved for robotic floor care.
BUILT AROUND YOUR SPACE
Support routine floor care while keeping staff focused on the areas that need their attention.
01 / THE CHALLENGE
Define which spaces and cleaning tasks are approved for robotic floor care.
Agree appropriate working hours and assess noise on site.
Plan around beds, trolleys and changing corridor access.
Set clear inspection and escalation responsibilities.
02 / YOUR ENVIRONMENT
Healthcare environments can include mixed flooring, busy corridors, several levels and noise-sensitive areas.

03 / A PRACTICAL CLEANING PLAN
Assign repeatable floor routes within approved areas.
Allow staff to focus on touchpoints and manual cleaning tasks.
Review completed tasks against the facility’s own standards.
Agree the cleaning area, completion window and inspection criteria before a trial. Record interventions and service time as well as floor coverage.
COMPARE YOUR CLEANING OPTIONS
Compare the people time and operating costs needed to deliver the same cleaning scope and standard. Adjust the assumptions to reflect your facility.
Fixed planning assumptions: 30 minutes of staff support per cleaning day and AUD 3,500 in annual robot non-labour operating costs. Robot support time includes preparation, emptying, refilling, routine checks and manual touch-ups. Non-labour costs should include maintenance, consumables, energy and any recurring fees. Net upfront investment includes equipment and deployment, less any avoided traditional equipment purchase. Use a consistent GST basis.
Please enter valid non-negative values within the displayed limits; cleaning days and traditional hours must be greater than zero.
| Annual comparison | Traditional cleaning | Automated cleaning |
|---|---|---|
| People time | 1,200 h | 150 h |
| Labour cost | A$48,000 | A$6,000 |
| Non-labour operating costs | A$0 | A$3,500 |
| Total operating cost | A$48,000 | A$9,500 |
Labour efficiency: hours released = (traditional daily labour − robot support labour) × cleaning days. The percentage shows the reduction in direct labour time, not a claim that the robot cleans the floor faster.
Annual saving: traditional labour and running costs minus robot support labour and running costs. Released time becomes a cash saving only when paid hours, overtime or contractor spend actually fall; otherwise it is capacity that can be reassigned.
Payback: net upfront investment divided by positive annual operating savings. This simple comparison excludes finance costs, depreciation, tax and residual value. It is not a full investment appraisal. Negative savings mean the assumed deployment costs more to operate.
Check the cleaning outcome: compare actual coverage, task completion, floor cleanliness and human interventions during a trial. Robot runtime, charging and servicing must fit the available cleaning window.
04 / FIND YOUR FIT



05 / IN THE FIELD

GAUSIUM GLOBAL CASE · PHOTO: GAUSIUM
Read Gausium’s account of a Phantas deployment in a hospital.
Read case studyYOUR FACILITY, YOUR PLAN
A case study is a starting point. Share your floor area, opening hours and current cleaning process so our Australian team can assess the right configuration.
Book a site assessmentIndustry and product reference: Gausium. Recommendations require local assessment.