Guest experience
Choose cleaning windows that suit arrivals, meetings and overnight stays.
BUILT AROUND YOUR SPACE
Build floor care around guests, service periods and the character of each space.
01 / THE CHALLENGE
Choose cleaning windows that suit arrivals, meetings and overnight stays.
Map where carpet care ends and hard-floor cleaning begins.
Review routes after furniture and seating arrangements change.
Separate floor coverage from room servicing and detailed presentation work.
02 / YOUR ENVIRONMENT
Hotels combine carpeted corridors, busy lobbies, dining furniture and multiple floors. Guest comfort is central to the deployment plan.

03 / A PRACTICAL CLEANING PLAN
Schedule repeatable floor tasks around the hotel timetable.
Select vacuuming or wet cleaning for each floor finish.
Keep staff available for detailed guest-facing presentation.
Agree the cleaning area, completion window and inspection criteria before a trial. Record interventions and service time as well as floor coverage.
COMPARE YOUR CLEANING OPTIONS
Compare the people time and operating costs needed to deliver the same cleaning scope and standard. Adjust the assumptions to reflect your facility.
Fixed planning assumptions: 30 minutes of staff support per cleaning day and AUD 3,500 in annual robot non-labour operating costs. Robot support time includes preparation, emptying, refilling, routine checks and manual touch-ups. Non-labour costs should include maintenance, consumables, energy and any recurring fees. Net upfront investment includes equipment and deployment, less any avoided traditional equipment purchase. Use a consistent GST basis.
Please enter valid non-negative values within the displayed limits; cleaning days and traditional hours must be greater than zero.
| Annual comparison | Traditional cleaning | Automated cleaning |
|---|---|---|
| People time | 1,200 h | 150 h |
| Labour cost | A$48,000 | A$6,000 |
| Non-labour operating costs | A$0 | A$3,500 |
| Total operating cost | A$48,000 | A$9,500 |
Labour efficiency: hours released = (traditional daily labour − robot support labour) × cleaning days. The percentage shows the reduction in direct labour time, not a claim that the robot cleans the floor faster.
Annual saving: traditional labour and running costs minus robot support labour and running costs. Released time becomes a cash saving only when paid hours, overtime or contractor spend actually fall; otherwise it is capacity that can be reassigned.
Payback: net upfront investment divided by positive annual operating savings. This simple comparison excludes finance costs, depreciation, tax and residual value. It is not a full investment appraisal. Negative savings mean the assumed deployment costs more to operate.
Check the cleaning outcome: compare actual coverage, task completion, floor cleanliness and human interventions during a trial. Robot runtime, charging and servicing must fit the available cleaning window.
04 / FIND YOUR FIT



05 / IN THE FIELD

CUSTOMER CASE
Explore the hotel’s Vacuum 40 and Phantas cleaning case.
Read case studyYOUR FACILITY, YOUR PLAN
A case study is a starting point. Share your floor area, opening hours and current cleaning process so our Australian team can assess the right configuration.
Book a site assessmentIndustry and product reference: Gausium. Recommendations require local assessment.